Canon 10D Reviews, Best Prices, Compare
 |
Canon 10D Reviews, Best Prices, Compare.
Product: Canon 10D Amazon Price: Too low to display Availability: In Stock |
I'd been wanting to go digital with my photography hobby for a few years, and purchased a nice Nikon Coolpix only to gain it was splendid for casual shots but calm not what I need for my action shots and more serious work. But the digital SLRs were too current, too expensive, and have too few of the feature I felt they needed for the trace. When the Canon 10D came out, and I started reading the stout reviews on it, I finally knew the time had advance! After a few months of using it, I can recount that I am totally gratified I made the switch!
First, even though Canon made lots of improvements over the D60, they lowered the label considerably. This camera has handsome worthy everything I need. The one substantial negative for most people, the fact that your focal lengths are multiplied by 1.6 is actually a bonus for me since I shoot almost exclusively with telephoto. If you do ultra-wideangle stuff, this is certainly a spot.
Being able to switch the ISO setting is tall. Positive, I could always swap my film mid-roll if I had to, but always had to kill a few frames, and it was always a distress to do. Not a dilemma now, objective a simple camera setting. I shot some indoor stuff at both 1600 and 3200, the 3200 was not true useable, but the 1600 was resplendent decent, particularly after some clean-up in Photoshop.
That's of course the biggest advantage I come by with digital. There's so considerable that I can do in Photoshop that I couldn't easily do with film. There's some reliable books out there on using Photoshop for digital photographers, and there are some gargantuan actions and filters that will support automate your corrections. I sell all my photos online through a website that handles all the printing and shipping for me as well, and does a grand job with all my shots.
I treasure being able to immediately stare the shot that I took. I don't always have time between shots, but I can often review them later, and delete directly from the camera any obviously terrible ones, and demonstrate off some of the substantial ones! It's a colossal learning tool and my skills have already started to improve as a result.
Another stout feature with digital is the EXIF information that gets embedded in the digital files. No need to represent your shooting parameters, impartial start the file up in Photoshop (or other program that supports it) and you have all the information on your shot: date and time taken, fstop musty, maximum fstop, shutter race, exposure and white balance settings, focal length, etc. Really mammoth particularly if you are unprejudiced learning.
The camera functions and menus are gorgeous easy to spend and fairly intuitive, particularly if you are former to Canons as I was. The quality of your photos will be greatly improved with superb lenses, don't use this distinguished for a camera and then bag cheap lenses! Obliging glass is really critical.
I would also strongly suggest that you gather a USB 2.0 or Firewire compact flash reader for your computer rather than trying to download directly from the camera using the rather dreary USB 1.1. If you shoot lots of photos this is practically necessary, I can easily gain a couple of 1 gig cards in a session.
Most of the gripes I have with the camera are fairly minor. I would like more than 6MP, more autofocus sensors, larger buffer (to handle more than 9 shots at a time), more frames a second, etc. But for the stamp, I don't contemplate you will collect a better digital camera,
Ahh, the $1500 magic number. I couldn't resist, and finally succumbed to digital. I've been shooting for 20 years with medium format cameras, veteran rangefinders, and classic manual Nikon lenses on my customary Nikkormat. For some time, I was clear that digital couldn't advance the qualities of film.
I view they'd never enact the film effects that I got so easily with my aged camera, like flaring highlights, shallow focus, atmospheric low-light stuff, skin tones, etc.. The digital images looked hi hi-rez video stillls, especially highlights- they looked like buzzy video.
Well, the 10D does all these things, and does them better than film. I gain in the long race it does them cheaper, and it definitely does them faster, as I'm not scanning for 3 hours a night. The first lens I bought was a 35mm f2, and it's been astounding. With the 1.6 focal length multiplier, it's similar to having a classic 50/1.4 on your film SLR. Very nice out-of-focus effects. With the 35/2 mounted and the camera on ISO 800, you'd have a hard time convincing me that any 800 spead film could near even cessation the images I've gotten. With a snappy lens, the obscene light capability of this camera is fabulous. But that's unbiased one of the salubrious things. Having different ISO films in different cameras, or chanding film mid-roll, I am so not missing that hassle. There's no shutter roam to assert of. The originate quality is very top-notch.
The engineering and interface gain are absolutely first rate. If you've stale older manual cameras and have a profitable understand of photography, you will be amazed at how intuitive the controls are. All the most often-used settings are factual there under your fingertips- white balance, focus zones and servo behavior, drive rate, ISO settings and metering patterns. No matter what you're fiddling with or how deep into the menus you are, the shutter release puts you true abet into shooting mode immediately. The control wheels on the top and relieve do unbiased the things you'd put a question to them to in a given exposure mode, and they do it with a precision and certainty that left me never wanting to go benefit to my mature cameras. (This is nothing recent for anyone old-fashioned to even a Canon Rebel G, but it's sobering for a classic camera user.) Settle trusty shutter speeds or f-stops, or tweak exposure by half or third stops honest there as you gawk through the viewfinder.
I've seen talk on the web about softness in the images. Personally I'm contented with it. You can always sharpen more later, and as they are straight from the camera, there are no aliasing artifacts at all. I maintain the antialising filter is the source of this "softness". When you zoom into details, it looks more like a film image than a pixel-based digital image. How could anyone complain about that? Tight details like watch highlights- these peer like organic details, not jaggy pixels. With over 3000 pixels across, I don't know what more people would want: you have to zoom in very tight to examine this, so I don't know what people are expecting. At 8X10, prints seek plenty engaging to me.
What else . . . the metering is very proper. Backlit subjects in front of windows are handled perfectly. The skin tones are objective delicate. The flare control and color fidelity of the Canon lenses is very very satisfactory, and I'm using the cheap stuff. The L series is certainly better quiet if you're well heeled.
The dynamic range is composed definitely not as wide as that of film- maybe cessation to promenade film, but any negative film on a incandescent sunny day peaceful kicks the -- out of digital in terms the brightest and darkest tones it can rob. The 10D is light years ahead of snapshot-type digital cameras in this regard.
If I had one astronomical gripe it would have to be the myopic feeling of looking through the viewfinder- a result of the CMOS chip being smaller than a standard 35mm frame. The optics of the viewfinder are mild built for 35, honest masked off for the smaller sensor size, so you sort of procure the impression of looking down a long hallway at the image. If you've ever picked up a Canon EOS film camera, (or the unusual EOS 1Ds with its rotund frame chip) the mammoth, stunning presentation is ravishing impressive by comparison. That, coupled with the 1.6X focal length multiplication is such a end of a lens capability- you're only getting the center 60% of the lens's image. (By the procedure, that one review in here that talks about multiplying or dividing the image resolution by 1.6 or whatever- it's complete cockamamie. It's the focal length of the lens that's multiplied. The resolution of the camera has nothing to do with it.) The whole 1.6X thing is a royal harm, and I'll be gay when rotund frame chips are cheap enough and the world can step relieve up and close doing all the conversion stuff.
Otherwise- its easily the best DSLR out there accurate now.
I have been very resistant to digital cameras. I mainly exercise a elan 7 and a mamiya 645 for all of my work, but after spending hours and hours every night scanning prints and slides, and even more time removing those slight specs from dust, I took the drop into the world of dslr cameras.
I chose the 10d because the rebel's body is a slight cheap and the 1ds is arrangement out of my imprint range. The 10d is a very sturdy camera with a superior amount of weight to it that helps sever camera shake.
The focusing problems other peaple have talked about is not point to in my camera. I have several friends with 10ds and they have no proplems either. I believe that people might not be paying attention to shutter time ar perhaps they are using third party lesnes.
The battery lasts a very ling time. To test the camera I took it to Disney's Animal Kingdom and the battery lasted all day (over 350 images taken plus a lot of reviewing and playing) .
This camera is stout and performs in a pro manner. The white balance braketing is really icy (no more warm filters needed in overcast days) . The images I took at 2:00 on a overcast day glance like they were taken tedious afternoon on a certain day.
I realy like that when you trasfer the images to your computer, all of the image info goes with it (and I mean all of the image info, even what lense you had on the camera {i.e. 70-200} and the precise mm the lense was at when the image was taken {i.e. 105}
If you have any doubts about purchasing you can attach them aside. Canon has really produced a spectacular camera that yields spectacular results.
