Canon XS Black Prices, Reviews, Sales, Compare
 |
Canon XS Black Prices, Reviews, Sales, Compare.
Product: Canon XS Black Amazon Price: Too low to display Availability: In Stock |
Compare Prices on Canon XS Black
* December 7, 2008 *
When I originally wrote this review support in August 2008, the imprint of the XSi and the XS kits were the same. Attend then, you would have been foolish to lift the XS kit when the XSi offered a lot more at the same brand. During the second-half of 2008, the label of the XS kit has dropped significantly. Due to the famous imprint inequity between the Canon XSi kit and the Canon XS kit, I have revised this article.
The Canon EOS Rebel XS is the "microscopic brother" of the Canon EOS Rebel XSi which means they are both almost the same camera, but the XSi has more to offer than the XS. Perhaps judge basing your buying decision on how serious you will be taking up digital SLR photography. If you firmly occupy that you will grasp digital SLR photography very seriously in the long urge and want a solid entry-level digital SLR camera, then the Canon XSi may be a better choice for you. If imprint is your main danger and you are only looking for Canon's bottom entry-level digital SLR model, then the new label of the Canon XS kit is quite salubrious of a retract consideration.
Both models were released in 2008, with the Canon XSi released in April and the Canon XS released four months later in August. By comparison, the XS is a trimmed-down version of the XSi.
Here are the necessary similarities of the XSi and the XS:
* Both have practically the same great single-plate CMOS sensor and the Digic III Image Processor, except the XSi is 12.2MP while the XS is only 10.1MP (megapixels) .
* Both have the Canon EOS Integrated Cleaning System.
* Both can be purchased with the same EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Kit Lens. It is possible to hold the XSi camera body without the kit lens.
* Both have Live Concept Function with their LCD displays.
* Both are fully compatible with Canon EF and EF-S lenses.
* Both spend SD and SDHC memory cards.
* Both expend the same battery pack (LP-E5) and the same optional battery grip (BG-E5) .
* The XS is compatible with most of the Canon EOS camera system accessories that can be ragged with the XSi.
Now here are the differences between the XS and the XSi:
* The XSi has more megapixels at 12.2MP while the XS is 10.1MP.
* For JPEG, the XSi can continuously shoot at 3.5 fps while the XS can do 3.0 fps. But for RAW, the XSi is considerable better at 3.5 fps while the XS can only do 1.5 fps.
* The LCD monitor of the XSi measures 3.0 inches while the XS has a smaller veil at 2.5 inches.
* The XSi has a 9-point AF system while the XS has only a 7-point.
* The XSi has Situation metering while the XS does not. Both have Evaluative, Partial, and Center-weighted metering, however.
* The XSi RAW is 14-bit while the XS RAW is 12-bit.
* XSi has Highlight Tone Priority while XS does not.
* The viewfinder of the XSi provides 0.87x magnification while the XS provides 0.81x.
* The XSi can use the RC-1 or the RC-5 wireless remote shutter release, but the XS is not compatible with either so you won't be able to employ a wireless remote release.
* You cannot remove the XS without the kit lens.
My point of this review is to benefit consumers weigh their decision between the XSi and the XS from a pricing perspective. As of this writing, I feel that the XSi is currently the best Canon entry-level digital SLR camera for serious beginning enthusiasts. In my plan, the XS is best for those primarily concerned with the ticket. If you mediate you will not need definite features that the XSi has but the XS does not, then buying the XS will effect you money. Not everyone will employ all of the features on the XSi. However, the XSi may provide serious enthusiasts with more room for growth compared to the XS.
NOTE: Canon USA officially released the EOS Rebel XS in August 2008 and was first announced by Canon USA on July 8, 2008.
"Date first available at Amazon.com: June 17, 2003" is truly an error.
I spent several weeks reviewing the REBEL XS vs it's many 10 MP adversaries, I even checked it against the ultra zooms as I wanted the convenience of video as well, but too many estimable things stood out with this camera and so I decided upon it. I bought the rebel XS and after days of dirt testing this camera I've found it a blooming experience.
Now I'm a professional videographer attached to a tv place in Trinidad & Tobago, my purpose for this camera was the need for a speedy gripping collected shot camera that would be impressive under uncouth light and calm take impressive portrait shots to be venerable for my website and for stout prints. I didn't want to shell out over a $1000. US for a camera body.
What is tagged by Canon is true: The plump auto mode is truly correct and gives trustworthy shots always, it makes photography so easy for a beginner or intermediate. The portrait mode isn't blurry, images are trim, nicely toned, advantageous in quality for sizable size prints. The P ( program mode) I like alot at first because this mode sets exposure so nicely I found it addictive. I shot alot of night pics of cars on a freeway, with quick-witted, entertaining, inviting colours emerging. Night pics at 800 iso had very very very petite noise, and I mean I was searching the pics on 15" monitors for reason to complain, but was really impressed.
The auto focus is really rapidly. Th XS comes with "only" a 7 point auto focus system compared to the XSi 9 point, forgive me when I say there may be no need for another 2 points when the camera focusses so hastily and so accurately. I have not gotten a soft image when shot with the auto focus operating.
Now for those point and shoot cams that boast about "face detection"....5 faces...6,7, some even 15. I also have a 10 mp ultra zoom, this simply matters small if not at all, if the focussing ability of the camera is bad or average, and given the "average lens" quality they're made of.
I have learnt clearly that a 10 MP ultra zoom simply cannot compare to a 10 MP D SLR...chalk and cheese.
I also bought the Tamron 70mm - 300mm, F4-5.6 telephoto/ macro lens. No vignetting at either ruin of the lens.
Auto iso is simply pleasing, have not taken a shot where the camera over estimated or underestimated the iso levels.
The Manual mode of this camera is the most impressive for me. The rebel XS via various magazine testing has near up faster than it's other 10 MP rivals when it comes to fps shooting, and burst images. It really does shoot 3 fps consistently, it shoots 2.3 fps in improper light, worst case is over 1 fps all at 10 MP quality.
I haven't aged a lower quality since, given I bought a Transcend 8GB SDHC card storage is not an assert.
Most of my shooting has been at night, for the puny done in daylight, it has been fabulous. Colours are very knowing, depth of field very very nice. Macros works well. Image optimizer simply terrorized life out of me. I was in a shadowy site and without flash it really improves the subject without over blowing the background, stuff that is almost impossible on point and shoot cams.
Stuff I disagree with from the "reviews" : 1- "The camera feels cheaply built"....simply inappropriate, nothing is shabby, buttons are actually easy to press, doesn't have cheap clicks to them, the lens mount has a obtain feel to it, and a respectable snap when it is spot. Battery compartment is certainly glean. Your finger must intricately inaugurate the door for entry, won't be an accident sing. Rubber door at a.v. ports snap in well. Rubber grip is firm enough, calm enough to not irritate your hands.
2- " XS is "overpriced" compared to the XSi.....Xsi shoots slower than the XS, XSi represent quality is equal to the XS even though the XSi is 12 MP. The XSi may be the 3" LCD and a few other upgrades, but these upgrades don't add up when the report is taken and the quality of both cameras match alike. I may have chosen the XSI if I wanted to consume the extra $150. u.s but for the lesser effect, I'm yet to regret.
3- "The XS "only has a 2.5" LCD compared to a couple of it's rivals having 3" LCD's". I can notice every thing clearly with this shroud, even with Histograms, and grids onscreen. If LCD's glean grand bigger then canon may need to install a tv tuner as well....the 2.5" is more than sufficient.
4- "The XS doesn't have Region METERING compared to the XSi, so this is a grand squawk"- haven't encountered a reason to complain yet, after 500 night shots and 200 day shots.
THE DOWN SIDE: the EOS software for uploading the photos to computer, and remote controlling the cam via computer is Abominable. It's a task to upload, as it is beach balling when you hit "upload". Digital professional software is non responsive. I have not been able to employ the software past the install point. Mac version here.
Better expend i-photo and photoshop.
I highly rate this camera, and as a videographer who's accustomed to t.v. broadcast quality the REBEL XS is worth it, and since canon is so intent on pushing the rebel XSi they have significantly lowered the note on the XS.....I recommend people purchase the XS and acquire a generous lens with the discount earned. The trick is in the lens and the user, and lesser the camera.
I want to build you the time and uncertainty in choosing the best affordable DSLR. For those considering the Canon EOS Rebel XS, the Olympus E-510 or the Nikon D40 / D40x / D60, I bear the Canon XS is the best choice. Also, at the mark contrast between the XS and the SXi ($150-200 as of December '08), the XS is an edifying alternative--both retract exactly the same high quality pictures, effect the 2MP inequity, which is negligible at the raze. Please effect that the XS's unusual lens kit comes with the better quality EFS 18-55 Image Stabilization lens (they are better engineered) ; and that Canon is offering nowadays marvelous rebates on telephoto lenses when coupled with the take of the XS (I bought mine with the entry-level Canon EF 75-300mm III lens with a trustworthy instant Canon rebate. Don't acquire from anybody different from B&H Photo, directly from Amazon, Adorama, Buydig/Beach Camera; halt away from Broadway Photo and TriState) .
Canons are common for the great image processing. Nikons for their Nikor lenses. Olympus, some say, for the color of some of the pictures they catch.
The Olympus E-510 has significant flaws, e.g., the average performance in high ISO speeds and highlight blowing. Also, its inconsistency with superb results is worth noting.
The Nikon D40 lacks famous features, e.g., image stabilization in their kit lens. The D60 is lacking the high relate quality ratings of the Canon XS. Both Nikons are nice looking, which is a selling factor I usually consider; but relate quality should be your top criterion for the long speed.
Don't go through the extensive research I have already done (months, and intense debating) . The Canon XS is a winner (specially with the novel IS lens kit), even more with its novel notice (Dec. '08: $480) . It is feature rich (you can even add 3 of your preferred defined Characterize Style modes), good/professional looking (murky body), even the sound of the shooter is nicer than the others. Bottom line: First-rate recount quality, high ISO/low light noteworthy performance, and relevant features and dwelling for customization beget the Canon XS a winner for months and even years to approach.
